A Lesson in Democracy

Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary.

Ever since an educated fruit seller from a small town in Tunisia set himself on fire in protest over unemployment, poverty and corruption, the embers of that singular act have fanned revolutionary flames of protest and civic action like no other time in our recent history. Tunisia, Egypt and now Algeria, Bahrain and Libya are feeling the popular heat and collective fervor for freedom, equality, the pursuit of opportunity and happiness, and the unequivocal demand for self-determination.

Amidst the jubilation and awe at the current shows of popular civic activism, there has been underlying cynicism and skepticism from the usual lineup of nay-saying suspects. These polemicists spout the same negativity that has been recited time and again to delay reform and democratic self-actualization. Only now, after years of oppression and mindless obedience, has the Arab population come to the realization that it is the individual that makes up the collective. And that it is through singular actions of individuals that movements and revolutions are made.

Recently, while stuck in traffic in a taxi in downtown Amman, Jordan, my driver turned around and asked me:

“Do you believe in democracy?”

I stopped for a minute, and then resoundingly answered, “Yes, I do.”

He then asked, “But doesn’t freedom have its limits? Doesn’t the West constantly try to implement its version of democracy on us? All they want is for us to be like them, to give women more rights so that they can start to rule and control us men”.

I stopped for a minute to absorb what he was saying, although every fiber of my being was screaming to throw his words back in his face with some well-worded Western-constructed argument about gender equality and human rights – courtesy of my years spent in schools and universities in the West. Instead, I looked at him and very calmly and with almost equal conviction replied:

“You know, you are right. You are absolutely right.”

What this outspoken taxi driver in downtown Amman made me realize, or rather confirm, is that yes, democracy is not the answer – at least not in its current mutated form. Democracy, as we have come to know and understand it, is a Western imposed system that spouts seemingly foreign and hypocritical concepts. There is no need to mention the scores of democratic elections that have taken place around the world, only to be made obsolete and void because of Western dissatisfaction with the people’s choice – insert here Hamas in Gaza 2006, Salvador Allende in Chile 1973, Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran 1953… The list goes on and on…

What my short taxi ride didn’t allow, however, was a chance for me to explain to this wise, cynical, yet understandably misguided old man, was that the democratic ideal has in fact been hijacked and held hostage by the West. It has been snatched away from the very constituency – us the people – that it is meant to protect, by those who purport to uphold it. What I didn’t have a chance to explain is that real and true democracy does not come from lands far away, from presidents and prime ministers who spew words of freedom on the one hand, and scheme and support local dictators on the other. Democracy is an action, a practice, something that you do rather than something that you are. Democracy is a mutable structure made up of smaller vital, popularly supported components: civic participation, civic action, open dialogue, informed choice, and equal opportunity… What I didn’t get a chance to tell the taxi driver was that democracy was in fact just practiced in the very taxi we were sitting in!

– Change in a Box


7 responses to “A Lesson in Democracy

  1. Well put. thx

  2. Fantastic.. Don’t stop!

  3. Amazing. Cultural relativism is where its at.

  4. Democracy comes in many forms. Western democracy is representative democracy, where people elect leaders who then decide what is best for the people. The people have little say in the actual policies, because even as these leaders form parties that have manifestoes, they do not stick to their manifestoes given the leeway the system gives to the leaders. Furthermore the system overall produces only a certain range of traditional parties that you can chose from, so that the range of possibilities are restricted from the start (the extreme example is the choice between Republic and Democratic parties in America that have the same policies essentially aimed at getting funding from corporations). Thus the democracy in western countries is only ‘theoretical’, there is no voting directly for actual policies that you want. For true democracy there must be a much closer link between voting and policies. Furthermore the illusory nature of ‘majority voting’ as a ‘democratic’ voting system is due to the fact that the vast majority of people do go along with what leaders tell them – it is only an educated minority that actual demand proper government – thus 51% majority voting is an elitsit tool to keep hold on power. If you had say 75% majority voting, leaders would have a much more difficult time. There are many other important issues relating to all this, but these are the main ones

  5. Sorry for elitsit read elitist

  6. Great start! Would have liked to see what your “well-worded Western-constructed argument about gender equality and human rights” would have been. I imagine there would be some non-democratic, Arab woman flare to the argument, too. Best of both worlds, really.

  7. Great piece! The ending was powerful 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s